On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 09:04:20PM +0000, Michel Py wrote: [snip] > It displeases the operators who have been using DoD space as Industry > Standard Squat Space. Since this list is archived and referenced, rather than let that sit in silence, personally I have to note - there is no such thing as "industry standard squat space". - any person who decides to deploy numbering outside the mutually-agreed registry system (squat on space) signs up their organization for future headaches.
I had thought I drew attention to this presentation from Austin NANOG, but that was on the nanog list. Fun fact - the USG considers squatting on their space theft of service! And they'd love to hear from folks when it is encountered. Unfortunately the presentation wasn't recorded, but take a gander at slide 4 of https://pc.nanog.org/static/published/meetings/NANOG77/2108/20191028_Elverson_Your_As_Is_v1.pdf ....and useful contacts are on slide 11 and 18. IMO, not speaking on behalf of any other person or organization, etc etc. Cheers, Joe -- Posted from my personal account - see X-Disclaimer header. Joe Provo / Gweep / Earthling _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
