On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:42 AM Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Apr 14, 2020, at 00:38 , William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 8:48 PM Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote > >>> While the community doesn't have purview over fees we have input into > >>> that process. If this is something that we would strongly like to prefer > >>> as a solution to this problem. We can make this as a strong suggestion > >>> to the board for their consideration. > >> > >> Mr. Quixote, Windmill… Windmill, Mr. Quixote. > > > > If we have something approaching a consensus that it should happen, > > maybe it should be a litmus test for the candidates this fall. > > If you can convince enough members, sure… However, it will take at least two > cycles of that (so October, 2021 to take effect January, 2022) to get a > majority of seats on the board affected.
Hi Owen, Do we need to turn over a majority? Or do we just need to present the remaining trustees with clear and convincing evidence that the members want IPv6 to be cost-neutral to every existing IPv4 registrant? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin [email protected] https://bill.herrin.us/ _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
