I have to chime in (not as part of the AC) that the protocol below is beyond insidious!
> On Oct 23, 2020, at 8:42 AM, Mike Burns <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Me, (okay, this is after a beer or two tonight) I was just having a > discussion with some people the other night, and we were discussing the idea > that a new protocol might even roll out at this rate before IPv6 is > universally adopted... > > > Hi Mike, > > You aren't the only one discussing a new protocol, one that contains > features beyond more addresses which would provide incentive for deployment, > as IPv6 notably failed to provide. Not that I support the attempt below. > > https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/doc/2020/discussion-paper-an-analy > sis-of-the-new-ip-proposal-to-the-itu-t/ > > Regards, > Mike > > > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
