Not quite what I had in mind. However, you demonstrated the point. Volume
!= substance. Personally, I find the AC to be too activist on occasion.
However I see nothing that needs repair here. I applaud use of the petition
process as it is part of the pdp. The petition itself, while long and
detailed, lacks enough substance itself to make me want to support it.
Your mileage may vary.

Warm regards,

-M<





On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 5:31 PM Tom Fantacone <[email protected]> wrote:

> Well, since you asked, I do support the petition.
>
> Tom Fantacone
> IPTrading.com
>
> ------- Original Message -------
> *From :* Martin Hannigan[mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent :* 1/13/2021 5:20:04 PM
> *To :* [email protected]
> *Cc :*
> *Subject :* RE: Re: [arin-ppml] Open Petition for ARIN-2020-2
>
>
>
> Anyone else going to say it?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 16:36 Annette Ogden <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I support this petition.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Annette Ogden*
>>
>> Anderson Electric, Inc.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ARIN-PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to