On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 4:47 PM Tom Fantacone <[email protected]> wrote:
> The petition process calls for volume (support of 25 separate orgs), and > does not request "substance". The substance has been discussed at length, > and I assume the +1 votes from these network operators come about through > substantive, rational thought. > > Tom, I politely recommend you re-reread what I said. I never challenged the petition requirement. > But since you raised the issue of substance, here's the substance of the > thinking for my own support for the petition. I originally proposed the > wait list block size limit of a /22 > [ clip ] I appreciate your comment and will duly note it for future reference. Thank you. > I imagine most of the support from these *"newbies"* is based on the > essential unfairness of harming dozens of legitimate players in order to > prevent potential fraud of a few. But I don't want to put words in their > mouths. I welcome their input and look forward to their participation in > the future. > I'm pleased to see that IPv4 brokers are aligned with people who believe the wait list actually meets their immediate needs. Warm regards, -M<
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
