On 2021-09-19 12:54 p.m., David Farmer via ARIN-PPML wrote:
So, currently end-users don't have access to SWIP, so how do you know they don't have good uses for it? Probably not good enough to pay more, but if it didn't cost more would they find uses for it? It is pretty easy to imagine it could be useful for multijurisdictional end-users to SWIP their offices in different states and countries, and I'm fairly sure there are other uses as well.

Also, take my WISP or small ISP example, from earlier in the thread, if there is a pricing differential on whether or not they SWIP or not, then you create a financial disincentive for them to SWIP the one or two customers they might have that justify SWIPing.  So then, they either skirt or break the rules, or even worse, they don't serve those customers because that would upset their delicate financial model.

Wow, stopped into the office to catch up on work, and 252 new list messages, don't have to time to fully read everyone's opinions, but do want to pull this into it's won separate topic.

The state of 'SWIP' is terrible enough as it is, with companies hiding behind everything from GDPR to 'cdn' designation, to knowing that complaints to ARIN about broken 'rwhois' servers resulting in little action (knowing I have reported many, that years later are not actioned)

Now, if pricing is higher based on whether a company offers SWIP, this will be a SERIOUS discouragement of doing so. It's bad enough that many operators who hold the highest counts of spammers and other threat actors, actually seek out providers that do NOT offer SWIP or rwhois, in order to keep their anonymity to better perform their actions.

If ANYTHING, fee schedules should be LESS to the operators that invest in the systems and infrastructures to offer SWIP or 'rwhois'. Fees should be HIGHER for those that have inaccurate WHOIS data, including POC's and redirects to non-functioning 'rwhois' servers.

My Two Bits..

        -- Michael --

PS, use some of the new fees to go after more strongly those that are taking advantage of the systems.. I once stated we need a 'public' facing tracking system of reports regarding bad operators who don't update their ARIN data, so the public can see how long they have been operating without proper information, and the progress ARIN is making to deal with these operators.


--
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc.
Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic
A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca
"LinuxMagic" a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
604-682-0300 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada

This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to