Hi Michael,
I appreciate you clarifying this issue. If this policy proposal is
considered out of scope, I would ask why Mike's policy proposal to
explicitly allow leasing is considered in-scope for this PDP? If it is
ARIN's position that it "does not impose any such restrictions on trade
or pricing" with regards to pricing structure, why does ARIN
differentiate justified need for transfers (trade) based on the absence
or presence of connectivity services?
I am happy to dispatch with any discussions that are not relevant or
allowed, but I think that your post requires additional clarification of
what topics are not permissible since many of the issues you have raised
as out of scope are germane to other policies under discussion.
Thanks,
Isaiah
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
