On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:53:34AM -0700, Chris Woodfield wrote: > I support this edit, for same reasons others have mentioned.
Same. > If I???m recalling yesterday???s presentation correctly, it was > ARIN Staff and Legal, not the AC, that determined that this language > could not be implemented an editorial change, so that???s not up > for debate here. Thanks for noting that. > One possible adjustment that I???d like to suggest is that the > term ???IPv4 and/or ASN resources??? seems a bit awkward, given how > many times it appears in the section. Perhaps we could add a new > section that incorporates David???s suggested language, but also > handles the clarification of the definition of number resources in > a single place, scoped to Section 8. We've been trying to pull the isolated/dangling definitions and consolidate them into Section 2. Maybe "transferrable number resources" could have a broad definition there, and would provide up-front clarity as to what is and is not transferrable under policy at a given point in time? Cheers! Joe -- Posted from my personal account - see X-Disclaimer header. Joe Provo / Gweep / Earthling _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
