Hi Joe, Setting up a thin VPN in not heavy lifting. This policy continues to only allow usage on operational networks to function as justification for purchase.
Regards, Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joe Provo <p...@rsuc.gweep.net> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 7:12 PM To: Mike Burns <m...@iptrading.com> Cc: William Herrin <b...@herrin.us>; PPML <arin-ppml@arin.net> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Revised and Retitled - Draft Policy ARIN-2021-6: Permit IPv4 Leased Addresses for Purposes of Determining Utilization for Future Allocations <personal hat on> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 06:23:27PM -0500, Mike Burns wrote: [snip] > For point B, this policy provides the same opportunities that ARIN has > always provided its ISP customers, to temporarily sub-assign networks > to its clients. > The only difference is these clients would not be part of the > registrant's own operational network. And if all the lessors do is [snip] "The only difference" is doing a LOT of heavy lifting here. Number resources are precisely for operating networks. These integers have no reason to otherwise be tallied. Registration rights are not investment vehicles. </personal hat off> -- Posted from my personal account - see X-Disclaimer header. Joe Provo / Gweep / Earthling _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.