The many posts to the PPML reflect your desire to somehow reclaim Legacy IPv4 
space that isn't being used or space that might have been acquired in a way 
that is deemed unethical or possibly worse.  As you may know, these subjects 
have been discussed many many times ad nauseum in this PPML since the time ARIN 
was formed.  ARIN does pursue transactions that are reported as fraudulent as 
evidenced by the multiple press releases dealing with fraud and the courts - 
that have been described in press releases in recent years shared on the PPML - 
so it appears the desire to follow up such reports is already a function that 
ARIN pursues when appropriate.  I've seen each press release describing these 
cases have been applauded by many in this community and I applaud them as well. 
 

With all due respect, as for reclaiming Legacy blocks - some of those original 
Class A blocks (/8's) were awarded to 800 pound gorillas with unlimited deep 
pockets to pay their on-staff attorneys. I haven’t looked at the list lately 
but there were organizations like AT&T, IBM, Ford and even the Department of 
Defense had at least two /8’s - and if I recall Great Britain was awarded two 
/8’s back then. These all were legacy blocks awarded in the very early 90’s 
when the internet was new and the National Science Foundation was trying to 
gain acceptance of wider usage of the fledgling Internet.  

So at least some of these gorillas still have their blocks and I haven’t 
researched it, but at least some have never signed any legal agreement with 
ARIN since they got these blocks before ARIN existed - and they got them 
without any legalese written agreements that pertained to the blocks assigned 
to them. 

So if ARIN decided one day they are going to go after all of these blocks some 
of which are “unused” ipv4 blocks, then they would likely end up in court 
against an army of talented attorneys. This is not a desirable nor a positive 
situation for ARIN to be in. 

ARIN has to treat all legacy holders the same whether they were Class A or 
Class B or Class C. So I would support ARIN contacting all legacy holders in a 
positive manner that have not signed an agreement to see if any would 
voluntarily release unused resources and/or sign an agreement.  The key words 
in the last sentence is voluntary and positive.  However trying to take back 
any legacy resources by force without a signed ARIN agreement in place, or 
without the permission of the organization or individual the resources were 
awarded to doesn't make practical sense - and is fraught with possible negative 
consequences for ARIN.  

For the ARIN region, the only realistic way to change the dynamics and 
relationship between ARIN and Legacy holders without agreements would be for 
the US Congress to act, and this is possible but unlikely. 

Others have described the situation of Legacy Holders in the PPML as a horse 
that has already left the barn, and adding the fact that these 800 pound 
gorillas exist with their army of attorneys, short of an act of the US Congress 
- that horse isn't ever going back into the barn.  Better we as a community 
should focus on moving the Internet forward in a positive manner than get 
caught up with trying to somehow chase a horse we can never catch.  ARIN can of 
course try and contact legacy holders that are reported as "Deceased" but if 
they cannot reach anyone for confirmation then we will all just have to live 
with that block being out of usage.  Those "deceased" blocks are not causing 
our organization or our customers any problems we can't overcome ourselves so 
we don't spend any time worrying about them.  I realize the cost of IPv4 
addresses keeps going up, but just as we pass along the cost of gasoline to our 
customers, we pass the cost of IPv4 addresses on to them as well as a cost of 
conducting business. 

I'm not in favor of chasing horse we can't catch.  My two cents.  😉 


Steven Ryerse
President & CEO

[email protected] | 770.399.9099 ext. 502
100 Ashford Center North | Suite 110 | Atlanta, Georgia 30338



-----Original Message-----
From: ARIN-PPML <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Ronald F. Guilmette
Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 3:30 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Deceased Companies

_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to