On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 8:35 PM Aaron Dudek <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Monday, August 8, 2022, Ted Mittelstaedt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On 8/8/2022 9:10 AM, Aaron Dudek wrote: >> >>> [ clip ] > >> LargeCo that has an /8 cannot go to an ISP like, for example, Comcast >> and request so much as a /29 from Comcast's own pool to stick on the >> outside of a network address translator UNLESS they justify utilization >> of that /8 > > > Disagree. They certainly can. Do i think that any ISP would do it? I > cannot say. > They would depending on the economics and agreements in place. Hard to say no when the alternative is more expense or competitive disadvantage. I would agree those days are getting harder and when you balance bits and expense they may tilt the scale a bit. But back to the point, economics. [ clip ] Sorry, you cannot be an arrogant ?@?#?$% on this issue today. > > No need to get personal. i have zero vested interest in this. just giving > a valid mega corporation attitude. At least Im not saying migrate to IPV6. > You’re killin’ me, Smalls. [ clip ] Warm regards, -M<
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
