In message <dm6pr15mb3864cb5aaa6ef1a29877edc389...@dm6pr15mb3864.namprd15.prod. outlook.com>, Steven Ryerse <[email protected]> wrote:
>The many posts to the PPML reflect your desire to somehow reclaim Legacy >IPv4 space that isn't being used or space that might have been acquired >in a way that is deemed unethical or possibly worse. Who exactly are you responding to? Me? If so, I will clarify yet again that *I* have not expressed any "desire to somehow reclaim Legacy IPv4 space". Somebody else in this thread may have expressed such a desire, but not me. I have been consistant, I think, in expressing a desire only to see ARIN staff reclaim number resources that remain assigned to legal entities that have ceased to exist. Some of those number resources are legacy rsources, but many (most?) of them are actually non-legacy resorces. (The example that I put forward here was of a set of non-legacy resources that remain assigned to what is clearly a long-dead company.) Indeed, I have gone out of my way to make it clear that I have less than zero desire to have ARIN staff perform any reclamation specifically on or against legacy resources UNLESS the resources involved are assigned to demonstratably defunct corporate registrants. >ARIN has to treat all legacy holders the same whether they were Class A >or Class B or Class C No, it doesn't. If the "holder" no longer exists, legally speaking, then ARIN can reclaim the associated number resources. (But I do agree with you that the _size_ of the resources involved is totally irrelevant.) Regards, rfg _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
