Hello - Taking off my ARIN AC hat and speaking personally, I oppose this. I believe - even though it's not perfect - keeping the requirement in place provides a form of risk mitigation both for organizations and for ARIN.
-Anita On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 11:51 AM Joe Provo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey folks, > > We haven't had any feedback here after the publication > of the Staff & Legal review as noted in Matthew's message > below. Given that it speaks directly to concerns raised > here on PPML, we need community feedback here to confirm > *our* impressions. > > Please let us know! > > Joe > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:50:13PM -0700, Matthew Wilder wrote: > > Hi PPML, > > > > Staff and Legal review has been conducted for Draft Policy ARIN-2022-3. > The > > relevant bit for the community to consider is the legal review, which is > as > > follows: > > "No material legal issue. Removal of the officer attestation would not > > materially impact ARIN???s ability to pursue cases of fraud." > > > > As shepherds, we believe this directly resolves the primary concern > voiced > > by members of the community. > > > > For the full staff and legal review, please check the following: > > > https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2022_3/#staff-and-legal-review-15-august-2022 > > > > Regards, > > > > *Matthew Wilder* > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 12:24 PM Matthew Wilder <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi PPML, > > > > > > I appreciate the lively discussion thus far on ARIN-2022-3, including > > > concerns around what prosecutorial powers might be lost if officer > > > attestations are no longer required. Thanks also to staff for > summarizing > > > the result of the ACSP Consultation 2021.4 retiring the officer > attestation > > > requirement for documentation of needs assessment. > > > > > > The prevailing concern in the community around ARIN-2022-3 appears to > be > > > that removing officer attestation would impede the prosecution of those > > > conducting fraud. In order to have the experts address this concern, I > > > (along with my fellow policy shepherd Joe) have requested a staff and > legal > > > review. Our hope is that staff (and legal counsel in particular) might > > > directly weigh in on how important the officer attestation is. > > > > > > We will make sure that relevant points are highlighted back to PPML for > > > the community to consider in further discussion of the draft policy. > > > > > > Warm regards, > > > > > > *Matthew Wilder* > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ARIN-PPML > > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > > > -- > Posted from my personal account - see X-Disclaimer header. > Joe Provo / Gweep / Earthling > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
