> On Nov 1, 2022, at 06:15, Brian Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > See inline comments. > > Brian Jones > Virginia Tech > ARIN Advisory Council > > > >> On Oct 31, 2022, at 8:09 PM, Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I’m not sure we’re looking to encourage greater use so much as to make the >> policy more comprehensible. > > Raising awareness that there is such a thing could increase usage.
It might, indeed, and if it does, that’s not a bad thing. However, I don’t see greater usage as the goal of this update. I see it as a possible additional outcome that could be positive. > >> >> Section 11 is rarely used these days (though it is used), but it was quite >> frequently used in the earlier days of IP. Nonetheless, it does still get >> used from time to time, often enough that I think it is worth keeping it on >> the books. > > I think it should stay on the books, it is a useful thing for researchers to > have access to, whether academic or otherwise. Then we are in agreement. >> Certainly any institutions or individuals who have made or would make use of >> section 11 are more than welcome to comment in this process. > > I am not aware of Virginia Tech making use of this section of the policy, > however I can easily see several scenarios where an experimental allocation > would not only be useful but in some cases required either by contract or to > meet grant demands. Indeed. Owen
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
