> Dominik Dobrowolski wrote : > Could we expect the adoption of 240/4 for unicast use?
No. This is not an ARIN matter, BTW. Expect, no. > There were proposals, yet do you know this is treated seriously? I would say seriously yes, although I don't doubt that some would disagree. But this is beside the point : the cabale that opposes it has historically been powerful enough to derail the multiple efforts every time. An interesting rally of strange bed-fellows. > Anyway I say it is better to have a block partially useful than not useful at > all. This argument has been made over and over for the last 20+ years and still there is no go. I don't see it changing any time soon. Although I have supported such efforts in the past and will continue to do so, this is flogging a dead horse. Michel _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
