On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 4:57 PM John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Oct 2, 2023, at 7:30 PM, William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... I'm not, for example, aware of any SWIP obligations I've > > picked up due to ARIN restructuring its process. Nor am I aware of > > holders of what were formerly allocations being released from their > > SWIP obligations. > > > > The policy obligations to record sub-delegations up to the community and set > in policy, > so yes – to the extent that you make allocations to downstream customers, you > are > indeed subject to the present policy (NRPM 4.2.3) regarding recording for > reallocating > address space to customers. > > You may operate in a manner without such subdelegations (as is the case for > most > organizations operating as an "end-users”) – in which case such requirements > don’t > come into play.
And that's a change. Previous allocation holders did not have an option to not report. In fact, reporting their own usage in addition to delegations facilitated the justification process for the next block of addresses. There's nothing wrong with the new approach. It's sensible. But it's different than the old approach in lots of subtle ways. I dare say: when practice of the new approach gets well underway we're likely to find it's different in ways we haven't imagined yet. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin [email protected] https://bill.herrin.us/ _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
