Fernando, On Feb 21, 2024, at 7:46 AM, Fernando Frediani <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 21 Feb 2024, 12:30 Owen DeLong, <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> The policy you are proposing is not only the wrong thing to do (see above), >> it is also quite trivially worked around. One can legitimately spin up an >> organization for a few hundred dollars and a few hours of work. > > That's a theory you have without knowing ARIN tools and possibilities.
In another sign of the apocalypse, I agree with Owen. If a new company is set up and obtains address space via the waitlist, your desire to limit allocations to “newcomers” would appear to have been met. If that company was then acquired by an organization that already had address space, what would you have ARIN do? (This is, in fact, how many addresses were transferred prior to the RIRs acknowledging “transfers" occur, i.e., before 2011) > It is the interest of community that more organizarions and consequently > users can connect to the Internet, develop new business and make up new > technology and it is fair to think to make things to keep fitting newcomers > to this industry. You appear to be arguing that existing address holders do not connect users to the Internet, develop new businesses, nor make up new technologies. Really? Regards, -drc
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
