The following Draft Policy has been revised: * ARIN-2023-8: Reduce 4.1.8 Maximum Allocation Revised text is below and can be found at: https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2023_8 You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will evaluate the discussion to assess the conformance of this Draft Policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as stated in the Policy Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these principles are: * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration * Technically Sound * Supported by the Community The PDP can be found at: https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/ Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at: https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/ Regards, Eddie Diego Policy Analyst American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
--------- Draft Policy ARIN-2023-8: Reduce 4.1.8 Maximum Allocation Problem Statement: 4.1.8 waiting times are too long, making justifications untimely by the time a request is met. New entrants to the waiting list are expected to wait three years for their need to be met under current policy, with a waiting list of around 700 at this point. Data indicates that reducing the current /22 maximum further to a /24 would significantly reduce this waiting period, and further tightening the requirements by replacing the /20 recipient maximum holdings with a /24, and preventing multiple visits to the waiting list queue. Policy Statement: 4.1.8. ARIN Waitlist ARIN will only issue future IPv4 assignments/allocations (excluding 4.4 and 4.10 space) from the ARIN Waitlist. The maximum size aggregate that an organization may qualify for is a /24. Organizations which ever held any IPv4 space other than special use space received under section 4.4 or 4.10 are not eligible to apply. Address space distributed from the waitlist will not be eligible for transfer, with the exception of Section 8.2 transfers, for a period of 60 months. This policy will be applied to all future distributions from the waitlist to include those currently listed. Qualified requesters will also be advised of the availability of the transfer mechanism in section 8.3 as an alternative mechanism to obtain IPv4 addresses. Waiting list recipients must demonstrate the need for a /24 on an operating network. This policy will apply to waitlist requests received following the implementation of this policy. Waitlist requests received prior to the implementation of this policy will not be affected. In section 4.2.2 replace the sentence: FROM: “All ISP organizations without direct assignments or allocations from ARIN qualify for an initial allocation of up to a /22, subject to ARIN’s minimum allocation size.” TO: “All ISP organizations without direct assignments or allocations from ARIN qualify for an initial allocation of a /24.” In section 8.3 Conditions on the source of the transfer, remove this sentence: “The source entity will not be allowed to apply for IPv4 address space under Section 4.1.8 ARIN Waitlist for a period of 36 months following the transfer of IPv4 address resources to another party.” Timetable for Implementation: Immediate Comments: Corrections were made for a typo (references to 4.18 as opposed to 4.1.8 as intended) in a number of places in the document, and a reference to 4.22 instead of 4.2.2. The core text remains unchanged, however. (Necessary changes/corrections made on Feb 6, 2024) Needs more careful review for intersection with other elements of the NRPM. Need to be careful with existing list member treatment. The author claims that they haven’t scanned the NRPM for other mentions of 4.1.8 that may need to be addressed. The author thinks section 4 can be drastically simplified further with this change. The intention in requiring demonstrated need is avoidance of the situation at RIPE where every new entrant got an automatic allocation, which resulted in many new entities incorporated only to receive this allocation. The author also noted a serendipity in the number of waiting list entries (703) and the amount of entries that could have been met with a /24 cap (703) in John Sweeting’s ARIN 52 presentation. Current waitlist entrants should be given retroactive consideration, but their maximum allocation reduced to /24. Additional text provides consideration and protection to those already on the Waitlist, to not be retroactively impacted by the policy once implemented. (Aug/Sept 2024) _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
