Further, since we seem to be doing an s/assignment/allocation/g we might want to do that here as well?
Owen > On Mar 26, 2024, at 13:33, William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 1:14 PM ARIN <[email protected]> wrote: >> Policy Statement: >> >> Current policy: When possible subsequent assignments will result it the >> expansion of an existing assignment by one or more nibble boundaries as >> justified. >> >> We propose that the text should be: When possible subsequent assignments >> will result in the expansion of an existing assignment by one or more nibble >> boundaries as justified. > > For clarity: "result IT the expansion" is replaced with "result IN the > expansion." > > Regards, > Bill Herrin > > > -- > William Herrin > [email protected] > https://bill.herrin.us/ > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
