I do agree with Bill's proposal as well. Breaking a big cumbersome task into multiple small ones will get the things moving faster. So updating the definitions first should help everyone.
However, I do believe that the word `Ethernet` should be avoided. While it addresses today's situation, we don't know what's going to happen tomorrow. Ideally what we want is to write a policy that will address not only today's needs, but will be prepared to withstand challenges of time. I can behind of what Owen and Tyler proposed, however I'm not a wordsmith and can't settle on what's the best replacement for "Ethernet" should be. All I know is that there should be one. On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 12:46:06AM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 4:42 PM Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > I think the best resolution here would be to move all definitional text > > for IX in both proposals into a proposed (and identical) definition in NRPM > > section 2 and then it’s harmonious and not in need of future > > synchronization regardless of whether either or both proposals are adopted. > > > > I do agree with Bill's suggestion that we finish 2024-4 including a > definition and defined term for 2024-5 and anything else related ("Defined > Term"). So I think we're agreeing. > > I object to the removal of "ethernet" from 2024-5. -- Roman V Tatarnikov | https://linkedin.com/in/rtatarnikov _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
