Some of this discussion is above my pay grade as I am not a technical expert in 
IXPs.

However from a neutral point of view, I agree that the exclusion of the word 
“ethernet” would tend to leave the policy flexible for future evolutions or 
changes to network hardware, protocols etc. However, I am in two minds as to 
whether or not this is urgently necessary. I don’t see any specific technical 
advancements that would render ethernet defunct in the pipeline when 
implemented in this specific scenario.

So, my pov is ok, why not exclude “ethernet”, but it is not urgent.

—
My best/Cordialement,

Matthew Cowen
dgtlfutures


On 26 May 2024, at 15:22, Roman Tatarnikov <[email protected]> wrote:

I do agree with Bill's proposal as well. Breaking a big cumbersome task into 
multiple small ones will get the things moving faster. So updating the 
definitions first should help everyone.

However, I do believe that the word `Ethernet` should be avoided. While it 
addresses today's situation, we don't know what's going to happen tomorrow. 
Ideally what we want is to write a policy that will address not only today's 
needs, but will be prepared to withstand challenges of time. I can behind of 
what Owen and Tyler proposed, however I'm not a wordsmith and can't settle on 
what's the best replacement for "Ethernet" should be. All I know is that there 
should be one.

On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 12:46:06AM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 4:42 PM Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML <
[email protected]> wrote:

I think the best resolution here would be to move all definitional text
for IX in both proposals into a proposed (and identical) definition in NRPM
section 2 and then it’s harmonious and not in need of future
synchronization regardless of whether either or both proposals are adopted.


I do agree with Bill's suggestion that we finish 2024-4 including a
definition and defined term for 2024-5 and anything else related ("Defined
Term"). So I think we're agreeing.

I object to the removal of "ethernet" from 2024-5.

--
Roman V Tatarnikov | https://linkedin.com/in/rtatarnikov
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to