Let me ask one more question, You intend to use the questionnaire for a research work right?
What do you want to prove by it? Because it is clear by your RIPE 88 speech, as by your tone here that you have a bias. Cherry picking the evidence you need is not a research work. Kind Regards, On Wed, Jul 24, 2024, 6:21 PM Nachiket Kondhalkar via ARIN-PPML < [email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for your contribution. > > The primary motivation for this change was that both RIPE and APNIC > noticed a large number of assigned ASNs that were not being advertised in > the Global routing tables. Approximately 21% of all ASNs are functionally > not participating in global routing. > > By implementing an ASN fee, they hope to have these unused numbers > returned to the RIR in order to prevent wastage in the long term. > > Each have taken separate paths to execute this. RIPE has a flat €50 fee > per ASN. While APNIC has gone for the first ASN to be free, but every > subsequent one being charged AUD600. While APNIC policies might not impact > hobby network growth in the future, RIPE policies might. > > When ARIN implemented these fees, they were justified as being a more > financial issue to stay afloat. > > Definitely appreciate your perspective though. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dale W. Carder <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2024 6:19 PM > To: Nachiket Kondhalkar <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] AS Number Management Study by TU Delft > > [You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is > important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > > Thus spake Nachiket Kondhalkar via ARIN-PPML ([email protected]) on Wed, > Jul 24, 2024 at 03:41:09PM +0000: > > Hello ARIN Policy community, > > > > APNIC and RIPE NCC have introduced an annual ASN maintenance fee from > January 2025. As part of a research group currently studying AS Number > management at TU Delft, we would like to understand the perspectives of > network administrators in reference to this change. Your experience and > expertise will help us understand and present the consensus of the > community through our research. > > > > For more information about the study: > > https://blog/ > > .apnic.net%2F2024%2F07%2F16%2Fa-comprehensive-review-of-rir-policies-i > > n-the-domain-of-asn-management%2F&data=05%7C02%7CN.B.Kondhalkar%40stud > > ent.tudelft.nl%7C9bca8712ff96494667b008dcabfc52e5%7C096e524d692940308c > > d38ab42de0887b%7C0%7C0%7C638574347408421839%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8ey > > JWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7 > > C%7C%7C&sdata=vPZRPXCPOUzVzRkk4Y9PW%2Bt0G1rdTPV5N2oZKIJ8wh4%3D&reserve > > d=0 > > For some of your questions in the survey around the perception of scaling > concerns, as I hope you are aware, there has been a large body of work > previously in this space. Probably the easiest thing to point to would be > the old IRTF RRG: https://wiki.ietf.org/group/rrg > > Dale > > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
