On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 7:33 PM John W. O'Brien <[email protected]> wrote: > I am in favor of resource policy that makes GUA more attractive than > ULA, or, in the absence of such policy, avoiding resource policy that > makes GUA less attractive than ULA, all else being equal.
Thanks John, Follwup question, and this is for everybody not just you: what should the off-internet qualifications be? Current qualifications for ARIN to assign an IPv6 /48 block for off-Internet use is roughly: 1. Have 2000 hosts, or 2. Submit a network plan explaining why ULA addresses are not good enough. More than a single /48 requires multiple sites and the above. There's more nuance and some corner cases (see NRPM 6.5.8), but that's the general shape of it. Is that about right for what the policy should be? Should the rules be more restrictive? Less? Where would you set them and why? Regards, Bill Herrin _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
