On Jun 28 19:46, William Herrin wrote:
> Is that about right for what the policy should be? Should the rules be
> more restrictive? Less? Where would you set them and why?
I expect that most organizations not eligible for PI space for
off-internet use under today's policy don't particularly need it. I also
expect the *average* situation will look more like requesting a /44 and
planning to use one /48 off-internet. Since it is relatively easy to get
large contiguous blocks of IPv6, reserving one (or more) blocks for
"non-internet-routed" applications is probably a best practice.
2000 addresses in-use is a pretty low bar to clear if you are optimising
for getting addresses out of ARIN. I see no reason to make the policy
*less* restrictive.
Eric C. Landgraf
Virginia Tech
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
