That’s a really bad mistake… I employ ARIN to fix this ASAP.
Lots of customers end up with multiple assignments, especially in IPv4. It is far from optimal for a customer to have multiple handles and I am hard pressed to understand any reason to do so. Owen > On Jan 14, 2021, at 08:01 , Jon Worley <[email protected]> wrote: > > Good day, > > No – you must use a unique customer identifier for each simple reassignment. > > Thanks, > > -Jon > > Jon Worley > Senior Technology Architect > American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) > > From: arin-tech-discuss <[email protected]> on behalf of > "nyguerillagirl brainycode.com" <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "nyguerillagirl brainycode.com" <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, January 14, 2021 at 9:11 AM > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: [arin-tech-discuss] Can a customer handle (e.g. Cxxxxxxxx) be > associated with more than one IP > > We moved from performing detailed-assignment (ORG+POC) to just SIMPLE > ASSIGNMENT. We had many old records that where once set up with DETAILED > that are now trying to do SIMPLE ASSIGNMENT. In the old way we always re-used > ORG-ID or HANDLE that we got back from ARIN for all subsequent registrations > involving the same customer. So suppose we have the following: > > IP-A , CUSTOMER_Y > IP-B, CUSTOMER_Y > > when we do the first simple assignment for IP-A we obtain Customer handle > Cxxxxxxx. The question is can we use the same customer handle for IP-B (same > customer information) or must we obtain a new Customer handle for each IP > when doing Simple assignment? > the answer was not clear to me from the web site. > > Thanks, > Lorraine Figueroa > _______________________________________________ > arin-tech-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-tech-discuss
_______________________________________________ arin-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-tech-discuss
