It's a shame that none of the previous EOMA-68 devices got off the ground before Intel pulled this out - "hey this already exists" would've been a serious advantage for EOMA-68 as a standard.
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Jonathan Frederickson <silverskull...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton > <l...@lkcl.net> wrote: >> which are, in your opinion, the "right set of interfaces"? serious >> question. if you're going to make such comments, you'd better be >> prepared to back them up and be prepared to justify them with a >> *REALLY* thorough analysis. > > I think all he meant was that Intel can pick whatever interfaces they > want for the standard that they think will be relatively future-proof. > They don't have to worry about finding SoCs with those interfaces, > because they manufacture the SoCs - they just have to decide on them > at the start. _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk
