Yea I guess 2400mhz ddr4l would consume about as much as 1600mhz ddr3l on the same number of channels. But it probably would be of little benefit to eoma68 anyway since the SoCs in use will probably reach the next bottleneck well before 2400 mhz 128 bit ddr4 memory bandwidth gets saturated.
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[email protected] > wrote: > --- > crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 > > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Bill Kontos <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Yea it's the chicken and the egg problem. I was thinking of devices like > > the 12'' macbook with sholdered ram and pretty much every ultrabook with > an > > intel ulv that has dual channel ram sholdered or in sodimms. I guess the > > thermal budget issue will become less of a thing when we get to ddr4l > > http://www.indjst.org/index.php/indjst/article/download/94832/70105 > > 36% less power consumption apparently... now all that's needed is to > *not* run them at the insane 2400mhz top rate which entirely defeats > the purpose of the exercise... :) > > l. > > _______________________________________________ > arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] > http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook > Send large attachments to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
