Yea that's what I meant, sorry my bad. My question is, what physical form factor will the EOMA 200 cards have( that is, what will "house" the electronics) ?
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[email protected] > wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Bill Kontos <[email protected]> wrote: > > Oh ok so do you have any draft idea what kind of housing the eoma 68 > > standard will utilize ? > > good question, easily answered (in perhaps a perplexing answer, > apologies) - anything that people wish to envisage. it's not down to > me (or the standard) to *restrict* people on what kind of housings are > created, in fact the total opposite is the case (hence why i am > creating reference designs). btw "Housing" has a special meaning in > EOMA68 terminology, where's that glossary, can anyone remember? :) > > now i think about it, you *might* have used the word "housing" > without it being specifically in EOMA68 terminology - in which case > you *might* be referring to PCMCIA Type I, II and III sockets. it > *is* necessary to comply with the *PHYSICAL* sizes of the PCMCIA > sockets and *PHYSICAL* PCMCIA card dimensions. > > l. > > _______________________________________________ > arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] > http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook > Send large attachments to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
