I'm not entirely sure why resolution should be relevant. Something without small defining characteristics that are unclear or illegible when the resolution is low might be desire-able, but I would assume so long as any is still atleast 10 pt font when shrunk to 3cm on its widest dimension, it should be sufficient.
On 3/18/17, Alain Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 03:14:11PM -0700, Mike Leimon wrote: > >> http://i.imgur.com/jjUbFx5.png > >> ... > >> Oh and I have one more general comment about logo creation of this sort... >> I think that >> it is very important to make sure it will look good rendered in only black >> and white because, >> that is essentially what it is going to look like when the >> logo/certification mark gets >> silk-screened onto a product. > > And also low resolution especially when scaled so that it is really small - > eg > the side of some box. This is my objection to the top of the two logos that > you have. > > > -- > Alain Williams > Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT > Lecturer. > +44 (0) 787 668 0256 http://www.phcomp.co.uk/ > Parliament Hill Computers Ltd. Registration Information: > http://www.phcomp.co.uk/contact.php > #include <std_disclaimer.h> > > _______________________________________________ > arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] > http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook > Send large attachments to [email protected] _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
