I vote the second as well. On Sat, Mar 18, 2017, 1:38 AM Mike Leimon <[email protected]> wrote:
> Okay, I feel like I should take a swing or two at this as well. > > In the following two cases, there isn't any special font being used. I'm > just using inkscape to trace out the characters that I want show... > > http://imgur.com/GrnfRHe > > Of these two logos that I sent, my preference is for the second. > > My personal opinion is that you shouldn't try and get too hung up about > the acronym that you are trying to capture and represent... (I say this > even though I did my best to incorporate the letters... blah). I think > sometimes that capturing the concept is more important than capturing the > acronym. > > Case in point, take a look at the USB logo: > > > http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-cId-qdXRcqg/UXE0Nya6FAI/AAAAAAAAAPU/8KGiICpEQa0/s1600/Logo+USB.JPG > > The logo is incredibly simple and doesn't try and spell out USB.. however, > it does capture the essence of the interface and what it seeks to > accomplish and I think that is what makes it memorable. > > That is really all I wanted to drop by and say. > -Mike > > _______________________________________________ > arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] > http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook > Send large attachments to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
