On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 13:35:19 +0100 Wookey <woo...@wookware.org> wrote:
> On 2017-06-25 07:28 -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 09:50:06PM -0400, Christopher Havel wrote: > > > In my experience, there are few things in life slower than > > > Chrome/Chromium after restoring a previous session... > > > > I use firefox. It seems to do lazy restoration of tabs, which makes > > it somewhat more performant. > > Indeed. I have significant experience of this as I operate the same > way as Luke, so have hundreds of tabs in 50-odd windows at any one > time. If only there was a better option... <snip> > > I should try Chromium sometime. Chrome itself is no longer supported > > on 32-bit Linux. > > I have not used chromium enough to determine if it better in this > 'slowdown' regard. I have, chromium uses lots of memory, just like FF. It has even worse troubles when it comes to more than 10 yabs. As for a slowdown over the course of several days, I've not tried it because of the above problems. > > I hate the way there aren't any cross-browser bookmarks. Another > > form of lock-in. > > If you are OK with remote bookmarks then you can use them from both > chromium and firefox (e.g. google bookmarks), and it's quite easy to > transfer them in either direction, but I don't know of a local, open, > bookmark-store mechanism. XBEL is an xml format for bookmarks. Elinks can use it, I don't know about FF or chromium. http://xbel.sourceforge.net/ Sincerely, David _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk