On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 4:05 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 8:27 AM, Richard Wilbur <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 1:00 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> rectangular all-layers keepout, showing 1 and 3 here... damn layers 2 >>> and 5 have a weird shape (not enough clearance auto-generated) let me >>> make it an oval all-layers keepout instead... >> >> Those do look very nice, indeed! > > did the trick. pain doing them by hand, had to do the flood-fill, > then adjust the keepout, then write down by hand the distances that > the keepout fitted cleanly to the edges, _then_ throw that file away, > _then_ go back and put the rectangle left-right... bletch :) > > anyway i moved the PWM via up a bit, left the 3V3 VIAs where they > were - sorted.
The results are great! Thanks for all the hard work to make it happen. So I'm happy with the layout of the HDMI! I checked for vias in component pads (manufacturability issue) and since the gerber viewer I'm using complains about all the tools in the drill file when I load it, I can't see the via holes. So there may be several false alarms in this list. Could even be mostly false alarms. But I would definitely check out C3 on layer 1 as there seems to be a via in the middle of one of the pads. (Marked with red arrow in attached picture.)
Component Pads Encroach Vias? Layer 1 C59, C60, C71 *C3 Layer 6 C139 C341 C340 C345 C332 C343 C335 C43 C69 C70 C99 C86 C106 C107 C57 C45 C50 C105 C108 C85 C96 C54 C38 C55 C85 C40, C41, C44 C305, C307, C308
_______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
