On 01/01/2020 11:07 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On 1/2/20, zap <[email protected]> wrote: >> Isn't Risc-V supposedly supposed to be more secure and isn't open power >> based on the old risc? I am just wondering, if the level of evils risc-v >> has done, justifies abandoning usage of it when you could just as easily >> do some risc-v processors with or without their help > that's the point: we *can't* do a massive libre / open innovative > enhancement to the RV ISA without official support. > > the consequences - the risk of a clash in the ISA - would be > absolutely disastrous. Oh really? That's odd... hmm... so you have to abandon risc-v you are saying? Pity that's your only option. I wonder if I should tell others about this. > > >> I guess my point is, they use more battery power than intel even. > what, PowerPC? that's a poor micro-architectural choice that doesn't > have anything specifically to do with the ISA, especially when the VLE > book (Variable Length Encoding) exists (equivalent to RVC). > > l. Okay, well you did say openpower, what is that? > _______________________________________________ > arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] > http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook > Send large attachments to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
