On 1/3/20, zap <[email protected]> wrote: > Just to be clear, you cannot legally sell risc-v processors even if you > remove the trademarks.
like any trademark, if you make no mention of the trademark, or any claims of "compliance", you're probably ok. from the time i worked on samba-tng, you can claim *compatibility* with something that is a pun or the *inversion* of a trademark. "arcfour-compatible" rather than "RC4 compliant". etnaviv. v-sirc. if you say "v-sirc compatible" and you're ok. > And, OpenPower can be made more secure and lightweight then Risc-V. that's very difficult to say. you start having to delve into what "secure" means at both the architectural, ISA *and* design level. "lightweight" is much easier to compare however would still take a significant amount of time. > Do I have that right? > > If so, then I will recommend the Hyperbola devs work within the > OpenPower thought process for making libre, lightweight processors. > > > > _______________________________________________ > arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] > http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook > Send large attachments to [email protected] _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list [email protected] http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to [email protected]
