On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[email protected]> wrote: > Back home where my pile of 8 and 16 GB mSD cards are. So I can do an image > install to see how large the image actually is...
You don't state which image you're using. The Minimal image is actually less than 2Gb > Disk /dev/sdb: 7.4 GiB, 7969177600 bytes, 15564800 sectors > Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes > Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > Disklabel type: dos > Disk identifier: 0xd7636468 > > Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type > /dev/sdb1 2048 61439 59392 29M c W95 FAT32 (LBA) > /dev/sdb2 * 61440 1060863 999424 488M 83 Linux > /dev/sdb3 1060864 2060287 999424 488M 82 Linux swap / Solaris > /dev/sdb4 2060288 7919615 5859328 2.8G 82 Linux swap / Solaris > > > Could you possibly reduce the size of the / partition so that the total > image is a bit smaller? > > Your image requires a 3.95GB mSD card. 7919615 512 byte sectors to be exact > (or at least with the server image). > > I have LOTS of 4GB in the 3.8GB size. For example the one I had with my > traveling last week is 7774208 512 byte sectors. > > It is not like you have filled the / partition; there is unused space. It > would make your claim that a 4GB mSD card can be used for the image install > more likely to be true. > > Or just state that better use work with a 8GB mSD card to avoid possible > overwrite errors. > > My 2c worth. > > Oh, and interesting that F24 fdisk reports the xfs partition as swap? > > Robert > _______________________________________________ > arm mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ arm mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
