Once upon a time, Udo Seidel <udosei...@gmx.de> said: > I can say that MS has signed shims for other AArch64 distributions. > I tested Debian, Rocky Linux, Oracles OEL and SUSEs SLES as well as > openSUSE. BTW, the RHEL shim is only signed by Red Hat and not > co-signed by Microsoft.
Okay, then that answers the "will MS do it" part. That's good to know. Then it's a matter of Fedora having time and resources to go through setting it all up and submitting shim (which is still a big hurdle). Most (all? not sure) Fedora AArch64 supported hardware uses u-boot, which might be impractical to use with Secure Boot; I'd guess each image would have to be signed, and I don't know if there's even board firmware that implements a Secure Boot loader anyway (so it'd be mostly useless for those platforms). -- Chris Adams <li...@cmadams.net> -- _______________________________________________ arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
