At 3:39 PM -0500 1/19/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >One thing that strikes me in this debate is that the argument seems to be >focusing on the total number of guns in existence in a region as being the >deterrent to crime. Or maybe it is the percentage of individuals >who own guns. Actually, Lott's work, which is what started this thread, was on the effect of concealed carry laws. As best I recall, he used either the presence of such a law or the number of permits that had been issued, depending on which regression (and what data he had). -- David Friedman Professor of Law Santa Clara University [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daviddfriedman.com/
- Re: More Guns, Less Crime? Girard
- Re: More Guns, Less Crime? Fred Foldvary
- Re: More Guns, Less Crime? William Dickens
- Re: More Guns, Less Crime? Fred Foldvary
- Re: More Guns, Less Crime? Bryan Caplan
- Re: More Guns, Less Crime? Pierre Lemieux
- Re: More Guns, Less Crime? James_Haney/camsys
- Re: More Guns, Less Crime? david friedman
- Re: More Guns, Less Crime? Dharmarajan Hariharan
- Re: More Guns, Less Crime? Pierre Lemieux
- Re: More Guns, Less Crime? david friedman
- Re: More Guns, Less Crime? Chris Rasch
- Re: More Guns, Less Crime? Pierre Lemieux
- Re: More Guns, Less Crime? Chris Rasch
- Re: More Guns, Less Crime? Tim King
- Re: More Guns, Less Crime? david friedman
- Re: More Guns, Less Crime? Chris Rasch
- Re: More Guns, Less Crime? Bryan Caplan
- Re: More Guns, Less Crime? david friedman
- Re: More Guns, Less Crime? Chris Rasch
- Re: More Guns, Less Crime? James_Haney/camsys
