In defense you can say that almost all of the weapons related  spending (Procurement and RDT&E budget – almost half of the budget when you consider the spare purchases) is accomplished having gone through some CBA in the process of deciding the approach to develop, procure, and then maintain the equipment.  An Analysis of Alternative is required along with estimates (actually by several layers of organizations).

 

The other source to look at would be the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR).  This policy drives use of CBA for certain purchases.  So you could estimate off of this policy! 

 

jdd

 

John D Driessnack, PMP, CCE/A

Professor, Defense Acquisition University

PMT-250/352, DAU Risk/Tools Subject Matter Expert

DAWIA PM, Acq Logi, FM Level III

NE-Capital Campus, Faculty Department

Program Management and Leadership

9820 Belvoir Rd, Building 205,  Room 115B

Ft Belvoir, VA 22060-5565

703-805-4655 (DSN-655)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

FAX 703-805-3728

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cost benefit analysis

 

Does anyone know how often CBA is actually used in making policy?  What percent of the federal budget (or state or local) has been determined by CBA?

Cyril Morong

Reply via email to