Thanks, Can You give me You config file?
I also boot form sd//mmc and have minimalistic system: only a ap d k l n series of packages. Full list of my services: udev, hald, dbus, ssh, cups, agetty. Most of boot time occupied by udev and hald. about 60 sec per each. On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Andrzej Telszewski <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > All times measured from the point when U-Boot starts to load the kernel > image to the point when login prompt shows up: > a) my custom kernel (2.6.32.9): ~37s > b) your kernel (2.6.31.12): ~48s > > Things to notice: my system boots from SD/MMC; your kernel is quite more fat > that mine (yours size: 1469820, mine size: 1097444; your modules size: 5.5M, > my modules size: 3.0). > > But all in all, the times presented above aren't as big as in your case (to > be appropriate add about ~10s for the power up of my board). Maybe you have > some services loaded during the start-up? E.g. some scripts for updating > fonts indexes, etc. I haven't done the full installation of armed: at least > I didn't install: D, E, F, K, KDE, KDEI, T, TCL, X, XAP, Y. Also the A, AP, > L and N series are installed only in minimal manner. > > By the way, aren't you going to switch to 2.6.32? That's the way that Stuart > suggested me to go;) It should be straightforward as the patches for AT91 > for 2.6.32 recently showed up on http://maxim.org.za/at91_26.html (my board > boots even without AT91 patch, even with 2.6.33 - but there might be some > things that the system misses without the patch). Thanks, it's interested news. \\wbr Vitaly Chernookiy _______________________________________________ ARMedslack mailing list [email protected] http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack
