>>> available in source code I don't see why people can assume one can
>>> just drop libflashplayer.so for Android and expect it to work and even
>>> if it did you'd open a can of worms.
>>It does work - I tested it. I suspect it doesn't work for Davide because
>>the library is compiled for a CPU higher than his own. This is what I ran
>>it on:
>>root@pepa:~/ac/source/kde# cat /proc/cpuinfo
>>Processor : ARMv7 Processor rev 0 (v7l)
>>processor : 0
>>BogoMIPS : 1987.37
>>processor :
1
>>BogoMIPS : 1993.93
>>Features : swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp thumbee vfpv3 vfpv3d16
>>tls
>>CPU implementer : 0x41
>>CPU architecture: 7
>>CPU variant : 0x1
>>CPU part : 0xc09
>>CPU revision : 0
>>Hardware : trimslice
>>Revision : 0000
>>Serial : 0000000000000000
>>root@pepa:~/ac/source/kde#
>That's odd: AC100 is a TEGRA2 (Tegra 250 T20) CORTEX-A9 based that only lacks
>NEON instruntions.
>Unless the library uses NEON instruntions (that I assume is not the sace or
>the android it came from would not run on any TEGRA2 based device) the most
>sensible guass I can make is that I need to enable some kernel >options that
>were left off.
I think I can exclude any kernel options as my cpuinfo only differs from that
in Bogomibs and Hardware section
...
BogoMIPS : 1992.29
...
BogoMIPS : 1992.29
...
Hardware : Toshiba AC100/ Dynabook AZ
The rest is exactly the same.
What else could it be ?
Regards
David
_______________________________________________
ARMedslack mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack
_______________________________________________
ARMedslack mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack
