Godi......

What're you trying to say here? HJ is better than ARR. HJ's music is better
than ARR's. Is is so???? You just added "BOSS" in front of all your
"allegations / complaints". The way you explained looks like this. You're
praising ARR but actually you're accusing him. I don't know how to put it
right in English. But in Tamil, we've onething in our grammer which is
"Vanja Pugalchi Ani". It means that you'll scold the person as if you're
praising and vice-versa. You did the same here. Try 2 grow up, dude...

See, there're many guyz entered this forum. Good 2 have constructive
arguments about ARR's music. But this case is not at all valid to be
discussed. These samples are meant to be used. If these samples are not
used, how come the person who sells this will survive? Commercially, there
is nothing wrong in using samples. They'll not be treated as lift. Try to
grow up, dudes...

Plz put an end to this stupid topic.

Cheers,
Siraj
On 7/31/07, godi_smile1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> AS A SINCERE FAN OF THE MUSIOCAL GENIUS, IAM EMBARRASED.
>
> guys, why are you all being sarcastic and arrogant towards
> the person who said that munbe vaa is a lift.
>
> lot of people praise our boss for his nature and character.
> people cry when they get to see him. but i think as ar rahman's
> fans, we let him down. we never agree defeat . do we???
>
> we are jealous of harris if he comes out with something good. if
> our boss's songs sound similar to any other we say its a co-
> incidence. there are a lot of sound which is similar to european
> music, like rangeela...kadalan etc. the flute piece of ennavle is a
> lift and our boss himself agreed in a interveiw. so its not co-
> incidence when our boss does and copy when harris jayaraj does.
> grow up guys.
>
> really, iam so proud of what our boss is achiving.
> if we are his fans, we have to follow his nature too, not just his
> work. the people and career he has created, all the life he has
> changed through chaity. etc.
>
> long live boss. love you to bitssss..........
> .
>
> 
>

Reply via email to