can someone give the link for IR's version of alaipayuthey
On 9/4/08, Siraj K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I NEVER heard IR's version. Coz of ARR only that song reached everywhere.... > I know there are plenty of guys like me who never heard IR version but > they're familiar with ARR's version.... As somebody stated, even ARR's > version is familiar with kids tooo... > > No offense. my opinion.. > > Cheers, > Siraj > > > On 9/3/08, prashanth.palanisamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> er.... I like both versions!!! >> >> --- In [email protected] <arrahmanfans%40yahoogroups.com>, >> "Ganesh Narayanan" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > I dont understand when people say that IR or ARR popularized >> Alaipayuthey >> > Kanna or that song reached more coz of some particular MD. I believe >> > Alaipayuthey Kanna was already a very popular carnatic song usually >> sung in >> > weddings and all carnatic concerts. >> > Over the years Many MD's have used songs like Maha Ganapathim, >> > Alaipayuthey Kanna, Krishna Nee be Gane, Kurai undrum illai >> etc...and >> > brought abt subtle variations by fusing it with western Music. Why >> only >> > MD's, Many instrumentalists and vocalists like Sudha Raghunathan, >> Rajesh >> > Vaidya, Guitar Prasana and other eminent musicians have added a >> touch of >> > fusion to various carnatic compositions. >> > And even the way the singers sang it in the ARR version was >> nothing >> > different from the way it is sung nomally....so u can call it a good >> > experiment with the way it was arranged, but there is nothing >> > mindblowing....there are many unrecognized fusion works of similar >> > songs...try to appreciate all of them and dont jus generalize by >> saying wat >> > arr did was incomparable and all. I jus feel we go overboard >> sometimes wen >> > it comes to discussion between two MD's. >> > >> > Meanwhile im writing this without having listened to what raja sir >> has done, >> > so its quite an impartial view that i project. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Music Heals >> > Ganesh >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Vithur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > > I agree with Gomzy... ARR 's version was a class apart... The >> Fusion >> > > which Ar brings could in no way be compared to any other MD. >> > > >> > > ARR - The King of Fusion >> > > >> > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Gomzy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > >> ARR's version was a class apart . He experimented and the >> fusion was >> > >> just brilliant. >> > >> It was a unique track and the first carnatic classical piece that >> could be >> > >> pumped up and played with terrific bass. And the singers added >> soul to it. >> > >> What Illayraja did was nothing different. >> > >> >> > >> No offence..my opinion >> > >> >> > >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:22 AM, anishshreya >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> I was listening to Raja sir's alaipayudae from the flim >> Ethanai Konam >> > >>> Ethanai Paarvai...wow ..brilliant..so much modulations and >> layers which >> > >>> is astounding. I am not sure here, coz situations in flims >> requirement >> > >>> might be different and music directors have to adhere to that. >> But arr >> > >>> alaipayudae was never in any class to raja sirs. Seriously me >> being arr >> > >>> fan...wants to be honest...the song rendered by kjy and sj was >> simply >> > >>> mind blowing. I am not sure whether can anybody be able to mix >> carnatic >> > >>> with western classical as such. >> > >>> >> > >>> No offence..my opinion >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > regards, >> > > Vithur >> > > >> > > ARR -- The Sweet Cube always >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> >> >
