Slumdog Millionaire Review, Telluride 2008
By Kevin Buist
posted 5 days ago
        * 
        * 
        * 
        * 
        * 
        * 
Danny Boyle’s latest offering, Slumdog Millionaire, is generating a fair amount 
of buzz here at Telluride. Not unlike last year’s Juno, the film showed up in 
one of the mysterious TBA slots, delighting audiences made weary by a slate of 
good but somewhat depressing films, such asHunger, Waltz with Bashir and Adam 
Resurrected. Slumdog Millionaire follows the story of Jamal Malik, an unlikely 
winner of India’s version ofWho Wants to be a Millionaire. Jamal, his brother 
Samir, and fellow orphan Latika, manage to survive an almost absurd number of 
scrapes, the memory of each one coincidentally providing Jamal with answers to 
the game show questions. The film is big, fast, fun, and colorful, but 
ultimately a mess.
The hyperactive structure of the film is born out of the life 
experience-equals-game-show-answer formula. The first scene shows Jamal being 
tortured by police who suspect him of cheating, unable to believe that a 
“slumdog” orphan could know the answers to all those trivia questions. Jamal 
insists he really did know the answers, and the suddenly sympathetic cops 
disconnect the electrodes from his toes and decide to let him explain further 
as they watch a tape of the show. The one-two punch of crazy slum story 
providing an unlikely memory that later serves as a trivia answer becomes 
apparent very quickly, and never deviates through the entire film. This 
structure might have worked, but here it feels contrived and repetitive. The 
pace of the film is frantic, some of the flashbacks have comic merit, but by 
the third or fourth musical montage, it all feels too hectic and sloppy, 
especially considering the rigid and somewhat boring structure upon which the
 film is built.
People have been praising the performances in the film, and with the exception 
of the child actors and Bollywood veteran Anil Kapoor, I’m bewildered by this. 
Dev Patel’s Jamal is passable at best. He’s sympathetic, but most of the film 
he looks plainly dumbfounded at his own impossible luck. He gives us no real 
reason to care for him other than the fact that he’s a basically good person, 
and he’s in love.
The love story, seen by many to be central to the film, is sorely lacking. 
Jamal and Latika meet because they are both orphans, she’s first allowed to run 
with Jamal and Samir out of pity. The brothers loose track of Latika, only to 
later rescue her from forced prostitution. The would-be lovers are again pulled 
apart when Samir, who has turned to a life of crime, forces her to become a 
part of his crime lord’s harem. Jamal’s impetus for being on the game show, and 
his motivation to continue his stellar run, turns out to not be about money at 
all, but rather to get on TV in hopes that Latika, where ever she is, will see 
him. Sure enough, she does, and with the help of an inexplicably reformed 
Samir, she escapes the harem to find Jamal, her one true love. It’s the kind of 
shallow love story that plagues many Hollywood films.
Don’t get me wrong, there’s nothing wrong with a “love conquers all” philosophy 
propping up a film, but the whole thing collapses if that love doesn’t feel 
genuine. Freida Pinto as Latika, like Patel’s performance, is so-so at best. 
The film is too crowded and busy to allow any chemistry to build between these 
two. Sure, they’ve helped each other out of crazy situations, but just because 
a fireman saved my life doesn’t mean I’d want to marry him. When Jamal 
emphatically claims that being with Latika is their “destiny,” we’re forced to 
take his word for it.
Some will say that many of my issues with the film are due to the fact that I’m 
not seeing it as Boyle’s homage to Bollywood. While it’s true that the film is 
deeply indebted to the colorful and melodramatic musicals that are a mainstay 
of Indian culture, I don’t think the film holds up even under this reading. The 
key problem goes back to the lead actors’ performances. Great Bollywood players 
are not naturalistic by any means, they are exaggerated, playful, and 
incredibly charismatic. It seems like Boyle couldn’t decide which way he wanted 
Patel and Pinto to play it. Should they be overly theatrical to match the color 
and up-tempo editing? Or should they play it more realistically, two normal 
people brought together by extraordinary circumstances? In the end they do 
neither.
Slumdog Millionaire is not without merit. It’s nothing if not an ambitious 
film, and certain scenes do work well. But ultimately it’s an annoying 
cacophony atop a predictable structure.

http://blog.spout.com/2008/09/02/slumdog-millionaire-review-telluride-2008/

Reply via email to