Masala Film?! The reviewer has been Chopradized/Joharized way beyond 
limit.




--- In [email protected], Vithur <vith...@...> wrote:
>
> Blame it on the hype.
> 
> The reviews -- mainly from the United Kingdom and the United 
States, where
> the film was released first -- for *Slumdog Millionaire
> [Images<http://search.rediff.com/imgsrch/default.php?MT=slumdog
> millionaire>
> ]* compete with each other in discovering superlatives. It is being 
billed
> as *the movie* of the year gone by, and has catapulted its 
protagonists Dev
> Patel and Freida Pinto into competing with Oscar heavyweights in 
major award
> nominations.
> 
> So expectation is par for the course, I hope you will agree.
> 
> But after watching director Danny Boyle's attempt at encapsulating 
the India
> story with a miraculous tale, I for one was majorly under-whelmed.
> 
> Let me try to explain why.
> 
>    - *Also Read: Showcasing Slumdog
> Millionaire<http://www.rediff.com/movies/slumdog09.html>
>    *
> 
> And for those of you who want to watch the movie first unencumbered 
by
> premature knowledge of plot turning points, please click away to 
another
> page, because it is impossible to critique this particular film 
without
> giving away what classify as 'spoilers'.
> 
> So where was I? The film. Do you remember a recent movie that had 
the
> tagline -- 'he was arrested for raping his daughter'? Well,
> *Under-trial<http://www.rediff.com/movies/2007/feb/09ut.htm>
> * too was based on 'real events'.
> 
> The point I am trying to make is that a film about real events need 
not end
> up real enough, or engaging enough. That is precisely what *Slumdog
> Millionaire* suffers from, IMHO.
> 
> The premise is brimming with potential. A slum kid rises above fate 
to
> win *Kaun
> Banega Crorepati *-- the sets are ditto, as is the background music 
for the
> show -- and the love of his life. He is helped by destiny, as each 
of the
> questions on the quiz show is linked to an event in his life. Wow.
> 
> But the execution falls very flat because of two basic flaws: The 
language
> barrier, and a wishy washy story line.
> 
> It starts off with Jamal Malik being given the 'third degree' in a 
police
> station because the cops are sure the slum kid has cheated on the 
game show.
> 
> 
> I agree custodial torture is not limited to Abu Ghraib. But what is 
not
> taken into account is the usual fall guy in 21st century India -- 
the media.
> If a 'slumdog' -- as the police inspector (Irrfan Khan
> [Images<http://search.rediff.com/imgsrch/default.php?MT=irrfan khan>
> ]) calls Jamal -- were to be poised to win Rs 20 million on *KBC* 
and if the
> country knew it (as it does in *Slumdog*), I doubt he would be 
subjected to
> any other grilling apart from that most profound of television 
journalism
> questions: "*Aapko kaisa lag raha hai?*" (How are you feeling?).
> 
> And if he was arrested for cheating, it would be an even bigger 
story, with
> reporters grilling the police and PYTs (pretty young things) doing 
PTCs
> (piece to cameras, the bit where the reporter faces the camera and 
signs off
> with usually insights like: 'What will happen next remains to be 
seen. With
> cameraperson in Mumbai
> [Images<http://search.rediff.com/imgsrch/default.php?MT=mumbai>
> ], , ') in front of Jamal's slum.
> 
> Instead, Jamal narrates to the police inspector just how he knows 
the answer
> to each question.
> 
> So we flashback to him as child diving into potty -- isn't once 
enough,
> given that Boyle's gritty and edgy *Trainspotting *featured such a
> nauseating scene too? -- to get Amitabh Bachchan's
> [Images<http://search.rediff.com/imgsrch/default.php?MT=amitabh
> bachchan>
> ] autograph.
> 
> For all the Amitabh-crazed fans, maybe the megastar does oblige 
children
> caked in faeces; be sure to try it the next time.
> 
> More such flashbacks reveal the scars life has inflicted on Jamal 
and his
> brother Salim. The Bombay riots that orphaned Jamal; how he and his 
brother
> Salim met Latika, the love of Jamal's life, as children; the 
underworld don
> who has children's eyes gouged out so that they can earn more as 
beggars;
> how Jamal and Salim escape him and land up in Agra
> [Images<http://search.rediff.com/imgsrch/default.php?MT=agra>
> ]; how they come back; how Jamal and Salim and Latika are thrown 
apart; and
> how, eventually, love conquers all.
> 
> Again, fantastic -- and seemingly real -- premise; but shoddy 
experience.
> 
> For starters, the kids (who deliver heart-warming performances, 
faring way
> better than those who play their adult avatars) and his brother 
speak in
> Hindi, and suddenly when they turn adolescent they start talking in
> *pucca*English. Huh?
> 
> *Arre,* that's because the film is meant for a world audience, and 
you can't
> have an entire film in subtitles, you might say. Fine, but then why 
do the
> police officers have to speak 'Indian' English and why does 
the 'slumdog'
> have an accent?
> 
> And no, a semi-literate office help in a call centre does not 
develop an
> accent.
> 
> In fact, a lot of the 'how he knows the answers' flashbacks are too
> contrived. Sample this, Jamal knows Samuel Colt invented the 
revolver
> because Salim got a gun -- it is never explained how -- and shot 
dead the
> vile man who heads the beggars' racket. In my hometown, the pistol 
goes by
> monikers like 'machine' in the netherworld; I doubt the average 
underaged
> Mumbai underworld operative knows a Colt 45, or Samuel Colt. The 
first gun
> is usually what is called a 'country' revolver.
> 
> And then there is the stereotyped, half-baked, black and white
> characterisation, almost bar none. For example, Prem Kumar (Anil 
Kapoor [
> Images <http://search.rediff.com/imgsrch/default.php?MT=anil 
kapoor>]), the
> *KBC *host, is the typical villain who taunts the *chaiwallah* on 
his show;
> and the audience joins in with jeering laughter. Agreed, slum 
children get
> life's rawest deal, but not on live television. More likely, sugary
> treatment on the show, and bitter backstage.
> 
> It is also not explained just why Prem goes after Jamal with such 
malice,
> beyond a muttered 'It's *my *show'.
> 
> I can go on and on -- like point out that call centres serving 
customers in
> Scotland don't keep telephone directories of Indian cities 
accessible at the
> click of a button, and that mobile phones are not listed in 
telephone
> directories yet (that's how Jamal finds his brother again) -- but 
the point
> is that *Slumdog Millionaire* is miles short of what I had expected 
it to
> be.
> 
> The really key events, the struggles of survival, are glossed over, 
and
> instead we get montage (albeit beautiful) shots hurrying towards a 
climax
> that leaves you untouched. A R Rahman's music is good, but not the 
master's
> best. But then, maybe on second hearing it will grow on you.
> 
> But -- maybe it's just me -- you never really feel for the adult 
Jamal.
> Maybe it has something to do with the acting.
> 
> I have no problems with the 'West' taking up themes of poverty and
> highlighting the real India. I can completely understand a 
foreigner being
> obsessed with the filth and the poverty -- I too was stunned by the 
plight
> of the homeless in New York -- of India. I thought *Slumdog *is 
brilliantly
> shot, and I am willing to forgive Ram dressed as a mix between 
Shiva and
> Krishna in a foreign film.
> 
> But I do have a problem with a story that pretends to be real when 
in
> reality it is just a *masala *film -- the kind we churn out by the 
dozens in
> Bollywood.
> 
> Yes, *Slumdog Millionaire *is just superficial fluff, mainly 
because of its
> gaping plot holes. It should have been much better researched, and 
they
> really should have stuck to one language.
> 
> Maybe the makers -- and half the world, apparently -- believe they 
have
> married Bollywood escapism with Western sensibilities, but it is 
not a match
> made in cinema heaven. It is more along the lines of 1970s Bollywood
> tear-jerkers, the kind where the hero transforms from street urchin 
to gang
> lord in one running shot and where long-lost brothers are reunited 
by
> tattoos.
> 
> Blame it on the hype.
> http://www.rediff.com/movies/2009/jan/09review-slumdog-millionaire-
sumit.htm
> 
> -- 
> regards,
> Vithur
>


  • ... Vithur
    • ... Thulasi Ram
    • ... Chord
    • ... ramakrisha laxmana subramanian siva gopala acharya iyer .aiyooo amma idli wada dosa sambar chatni .
      • ... Thulasi Ram
    • ... Aakarsh
      • ... nivensamy

Reply via email to