i think a win would be spoken for a very long time when compared to a nomination. agreed that one should be nominated to get an award and nomination is critical. but its definitely not a point to stop and say enough. nomination (one or two) can take u to the stage but wont give u an oscar. one should WIN to get an oscar or any other award.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:29 AM, pratap <[email protected]> wrote: > "nomination for 2 is more of an achievement than a win for 1." > Well said bro... > > > --- On *Fri, 1/23/09, V S Rawat <[email protected]>* wrote: > > From: V S Rawat <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [arr] 2 Best song nominations - helps OR splits? > To: [email protected] > Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 12:19 AM > > On 1/23/2009 1:20 AM India Time, _arr_raghu_ wrote: > > > It seems that 2 songs out of 3 nominations is the best deal one can get > > but I am wondering if the two nominations are helping or damaging the > > chances. > > I am afraid that ARR voters will have a tough time on deciding which > > one to choose. I hope the split does not weaken the winning chances. > > > > Raghu > > What exactly is meant in this thread by "ARR votes"? > > Are their people in Oscar board who are ARR fans? > > The way you guys are saying is like mayawati's party snatching a small > share of votes that would make Congress loose and BJP win. > > I feel that for such a prestigious award, decision makers would rise > above their personal likings and dislikings and would decide on the > basis of the actual merits of the individual cases. > > So, it means there are no fixed "ARR voters" in there, and there would > be no split as such. I personally think that nomination for 2 is more of > an achievement than a win for 1. > > -- > Rawat > > > >
