Jai ho will come out a clear winner..and it should..
Gulzar sahab rocks !!

ARR will win two Oscars!!
yahoooooooo!!!!!!!!!

--- In [email protected], Thulasi Ram <karoke...@...> 
wrote:
>
> i think a win would be spoken for a very long time when compared to 
a
> nomination.
> agreed that one should be nominated to get an award and nomination 
is
> critical. but its definitely not a point to stop and say enough. 
nomination
> (one or two) can take u to the stage but wont give u an oscar. one 
should
> WIN to get an oscar or any other award.
> 
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:29 AM, pratap <pratap_elen...@...> wrote:
> 
> >   "nomination for 2 is more of an achievement than a win for 1."
> > Well said bro...
> >
> >
> > --- On *Fri, 1/23/09, V S Rawat <vsra...@...>* wrote:
> >
> > From: V S Rawat <vsra...@...>
> > Subject: Re: [arr] 2 Best song nominations - helps OR splits?
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 12:19 AM
> >
> >  On 1/23/2009 1:20 AM India Time, _arr_raghu_ wrote:
> >
> > > It seems that 2 songs out of 3 nominations is the best deal one 
can get
> > > but I am wondering if the two nominations are helping or 
damaging the
> > > chances.
> > > I am afraid that ARR voters will have a tough time on deciding 
which
> > > one to choose. I hope the split does not weaken the winning 
chances.
> > >
> > > Raghu
> >
> > What exactly is meant in this thread by "ARR votes"?
> >
> > Are their people in Oscar board who are ARR fans?
> >
> > The way you guys are saying is like mayawati's party snatching a 
small
> > share of votes that would make Congress loose and BJP win.
> >
> > I feel that for such a prestigious award, decision makers would 
rise
> > above their personal likings and dislikings and would decide on 
the
> > basis of the actual merits of the individual cases.
> >
> > So, it means there are no fixed "ARR voters" in there, and there 
would
> > be no split as such. I personally think that nomination for 2 is 
more of
> > an achievement than a win for 1.
> >
> > --
> > Rawat
> >
> >
> >  
> >
>


Reply via email to