would anyone care if a. the movie had not gained popularity? gloden globe, oscars etc b. if the movie was made by showcasing another country's poverty - (we would probably be copying the script and making a movie in bollywood in 2010)
Bottomline is everyone is super J!!! and I ...am enjoying this.... People in india should stop bickering about this and start using this movie as an opportunity to increase indian music/movie & talent popularity. What Slumdog has given us..is a golden opportunity..and anyone who does not acknowledge that is a LOSER!! --- In [email protected], V S Rawat <vsra...@...> wrote: > > On 2/4/2009 2:51 PM India Time, _Gomzy_ wrote: > > > *Shamal Sengupta, tells us why he disliked /Slumdog Millionaire/.* > > ok. with that premise, let me try answering him. > > > *'What has Rahman done in /Slumdog Millionaire/ to get an Oscar > > nomination?'* > > Rahman does not composed music with intention to get awarded or > nominated. He composes music because he loves composing. > > > I am sure that he knows himself that he has done a very mediocre job > > here. > > You are judging here. You are not giving reason why you disliked it. > > > *The background score is a disaster. > > You are judging here. You are not giving reason why you disliked it. > > > The song /Jai Ho/ and its picturisation is another disaster.* > > You are judging here. You are not giving reason why you disliked it. > > > Why did the song need to be in the film? > > Why should any song has to be in any film? > > Why should any dialog, any music, any actor, actress has to be in any film? > > Why do films get made? > > Why do humans born. > > Why God created Earth? > > And - > > why should everything has to have a reason? > > > What a waste! > > You are judging here. You are not giving reason why you disliked it. > > > It was very unnecessary for that song to be in the film; > > You are judging here. You are not giving reason why you disliked it. > > > more so, to be shot in Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus. > > Why shouldn't it be shot there? > > Where else should it have been shot that you would have found acceptable. > > And, ARR has nothing to with selection of location, cinematography, > actors, dialogs, etc. You seem to be under the impression that ARR is > producer/ director of the movie. No dear, ARR is not. He has only > composed music for the film. > > > *'I don't think a film like this will ruin our country's worth'* > > > > *Rahman will get his cheque and continue making music and > > entertaining us. But the question is why waste your talent for > > money?* > > Because, ARR is a human, God has given him bodily needs and earthly > responsibilities of a family, so he has to earn a livelihood. > > It is just the way you are living your life and I am living my life and > everybody else is living their lives, in their respective commercial areas. > > > Portraying India this way gives a very bad taste. India has always > > been looked upon from the fixed viewpoints of poverty, prostitution, > > crime, superstition and blind beliefs. > > Right. But what has ARR's role in the above? > > > But let me also tell you what I liked about the film. The technical > > aspects like camera work, shooting locations, > > What? > > Didn't you just say that you didn't like Jay Ho location? > > > and location management were well done. > > What is meant by that? Could you cite some examples. > > > I will definitely show this film to my students to > > teach them camera angles. > > > > I am not being patriotic, > > Oh, I thought that was what you were being. > > > I am just being reasonable. > > Oh, I thought that is what you were NOT being. > > > I don't think a > > film like this will ruin our country's worth. I think the world > > knows that India is not just about poverty and crime but has much > > more value than that. > > > > Full Article > > The unanswered question is: > "why he disliked /Slumdog Millionaire/." ???? > > -- > Rawat >
