On 9/29/2009 8:52 PM India Time, _ravi_ wrote: > And does it really matters about an article written by any person who > just wants to fill space in a daily and agree to the senses? That was > quiet absurd when the writer in the daily claimed that Blue was a > flop bcs of songs (or one song in particular) as if every movie was > an instant hit or flop with its music. Had it been a case movies like > Mann, Khamoshi should have been listed among all time hits. I > personally felt a person who writes should do at least some amount of > homework and analysis when he writes in media than just writing > opinions and then generalizing it. And the one who doesn't is no less > than an those ppl who preach evil and force ppl to believe in their > views.
> Coming back to Chiggy Wiggy I personally never felt Kylie is > one wonderful artist anytime I was worse off than you. I had never ever heard of Kylie before her getting roped in for Buloo. > and I never borrowed the hypes > surrounded; but I got curious about an international popular artist getting roped in first time for an Indian song, that too by my fav man. I was expectant and eager to hear it. > So taking into account of ppl like me or to > those who never knew who Kylie is music sales volume is unaffected. I differ. I think several people must have got curious about this song that cost multi-million bucks and they would have bought it. > It only matters who is the Composer and AR name is an influence for > sales. The song has harmed the reputation of ARR also, me think. It is less than mediocre by ARR's standards. It lacks creativity that was so visible in each of 800+ songs of ARR. If this is what our man is going to give after Oscars, and with an international popular, he was far better before Oscars and with Indian singers. If the movie flops at box office (I fear so) then ARR bashers are going to have a field day. I am sure RAVANA is going to be a never-before highest point in ARR's life that will leave everybody spellbound. -- Rawat
