Agreed that hit and brilliance are two different things.  Chiggy Wiggy is high 
on the charts.....it's a hit.  That's a fact.  I also agree that Chiggy Wiggy, 
although a fun song, is not a "brilliant" song.  Let's remember too how 
expectations confound perception.




--- In [email protected], V S Rawat <vsra...@...> wrote:
>
> On 9/30/2009 8:54 PM India Time, _ichord_ wrote:
> 
> > Chiggy Wiggy a failure?  It has reached number 1 on radio mirchi and
> > number 4 on Indian airplay.  Well, if that's a failure, I wouldn't
> > mind such "failures" from ARR now and then....LOL!
> 
> Let's remember that popularity of a song is not really related with the 
> brilliance of the song. Or at best, popularity is inversely proportional with 
> brilliance.
> 
> - I had never heard of Indian Airplay list before its mention in this list 
> yesterday.
> 
> - Radio Mirchi is a private professional channel. There is no logic how they 
> select songs to be played, whether they are charging money or favor or ads 
> from the movie/ music right holders. There is no farmaishi program on Mirchi 
> that might have suggested that listeners are really asking them to play a 
> particular song. And they as well as all private channels do play all the 
> latest songs, without exception, round the clock. Does anyone have any data 
> of how many Water or D6 song reached in Radio Mirchi top 10 to prove the 
> greatness of these songs and how many of Pritam and Himesh songs reached 
> Radio Mirchi top 10 to make them great songs?
> 
> Let's don't rely on unauthenticated meaningless data to prove ARR's 
> greatness. ARR is great on his own accord even if a rare song of him is not 
> up to his mark.
> 
> --
> Rawat
> 
> > --- In [email protected], "Jahanzeb" <jahanzebtippu@>
> > wrote:
> >>> The song has harmed the reputation of ARR also, me think. It is
> >>> less than mediocre by ARR's standards. It lacks creativity that
> >>> was so visible in each of 800+ songs of ARR. If this is what our
> >>> man is going to give after Oscars, and with an international
> >>> popular, he was far better before Oscars and with Indian singers.
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> this is 100% EXACTLY what i also think. couldn't agree more. as i
> >> have already said i would say again that it is ARR's failure (one
> >> of very rares).
> >> 
> >> 
> >> - Jahanzeb
> >> 
> >> 
> >> --- In [email protected], V S Rawat <vsrawat@> wrote:
> >>> On 9/29/2009 8:52 PM India Time, _ravi_ wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> And does it really matters about an article written by any
> >>>> person who just wants to fill space in a daily and agree to the
> >>>> senses? That was quiet absurd when the writer in the daily
> >>>> claimed that Blue was a flop bcs of songs (or one song in
> >>>> particular) as if every movie was an instant hit or flop with
> >>>> its music. Had it been a case movies like Mann, Khamoshi should
> >>>> have been listed among all time hits. I personally felt a
> >>>> person who writes should do at least some amount of homework
> >>>> and analysis when he writes in media than just writing opinions
> >>>> and then generalizing it. And the one who doesn't is no less 
> >>>> than an those ppl who preach evil and force ppl to believe in
> >>>> their views. Coming back to Chiggy Wiggy I personally never
> >>>> felt Kylie is one wonderful artist anytime
> >>> I was worse off than you. I had never ever heard of Kylie before
> >>> her getting roped in for Buloo.
> >>> 
> >>>> and I never borrowed the hypes surrounded;
> >>> but I got curious about an international popular artist getting
> >>> roped in first time for an Indian song, that too by my fav man. I
> >>> was expectant and eager to hear it.
> >>> 
> >>>> So taking into account of ppl like me or to those who never
> >>>> knew who Kylie is music sales volume is unaffected.
> >>> I differ. I think several people must have got curious about this
> >>> song that cost multi-million bucks and they would have bought it.
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>> It only matters who is the Composer and AR name is an influence
> >>>> for sales.
> >>> The song has harmed the reputation of ARR also, me think. It is
> >>> less than mediocre by ARR's standards. It lacks creativity that
> >>> was so visible in each of 800+ songs of ARR. If this is what our
> >>> man is going to give after Oscars, and with an international
> >>> popular, he was far better before Oscars and with Indian singers.
> >>> If the movie flops at box office (I fear so) then ARR bashers are
> >>> going to have a field day.
> >>> 
> >>> I am sure RAVANA is going to be a never-before highest point in
> >>> ARR's life that will leave everybody spellbound.
> >>> 
> >>> -- Rawat
> >>>
>


Reply via email to