Brilliantly said, Gayathri. Personally I don't understand this super
analysis of every number of ARR like a statistician. How creative can he get
on dance numbers and still sound so different from the rest of the folk and
that too every single time.  And what can the poor guy do about ensuring it
becomes a hit every time, as if he controls the destiny of the song? Folks,
give him a break. 

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Gayathri Chandrakasan
Sent: 01 October, 2009 4:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arr] Why Chiggy Wiggy is not a hit ?? - Read on my opinion

 

  


Chiggy Wiggy is a fun number guys. Enjoy it, dance with it and chill out!
What is the whole point of harping on its 'brilliance' or the lack of it,
for that matter? Coming to think of it, does all ARR's numbers have to be
brilliant and different? If you want brilliant and amazing songs, ARR has
given that on Bhoola Thuje, Fiqrana and Rehnuma. Savour them! Chiggy Wiggy
is meant to be fun, and entertaining. So treat it as such. 

If we are going to scrutinize every single song in this way, I'm afraid that
very soon, we are just going to forget how to enjoy songs for the way it is!


--- On Wed, 9/30/09, V S Rawat <[email protected]> wrote:


From: V S Rawat <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [arr] Why Chiggy Wiggy is not a hit ?? - Read on my opinion
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2009, 10:38 AM

  

On 9/30/2009 8:54 PM India Time, _ichord_ wrote:

> Chiggy Wiggy a failure? It has reached number 1 on radio mirchi and
> number 4 on Indian airplay. Well, if that's a failure, I wouldn't
> mind such "failures" from ARR now and then....LOL!

Let's remember that popularity of a song is not really related with the
brilliance of the song. Or at best, popularity is inversely proportional
with brilliance.

- I had never heard of Indian Airplay list before its mention in this list
yesterday.

- Radio Mirchi is a private professional channel. There is no logic how they
select songs to be played, whether they are charging money or favor or ads
from the movie/ music right holders. There is no farmaishi program on Mirchi
that might have suggested that listeners are really asking them to play a
particular song. And they as well as all private channels do play all the
latest songs, without exception, round the clock. Does anyone have any data
of how many Water or D6 song reached in Radio Mirchi top 10 to prove the
greatness of these songs and how many of Pritam and Himesh songs reached
Radio Mirchi top 10 to make them great songs?

Let's don't rely on unauthenticated meaningless data to prove ARR's
greatness. ARR is great on his own accord even if a rare song of him is not
up to his mark.

--
Rawat

> --- In arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com, "Jahanzeb" <jahanzebtippu@ ...>
> wrote:
>>> The song has harmed the reputation of ARR also, me think. It is
>>> less than mediocre by ARR's standards. It lacks creativity that
>>> was so visible in each of 800+ songs of ARR. If this is what our
>>> man is going to give after Oscars, and with an international
>>> popular, he was far better before Oscars and with Indian singers.
>>> 
>> 
>> this is 100% EXACTLY what i also think. couldn't agree more. as i
>> have already said i would say again that it is ARR's failure (one
>> of very rares).
>> 
>> 
>> - Jahanzeb
>> 
>> 
>> --- In arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com, V S Rawat <vsrawat@> wrote:
>>> On 9/29/2009 8:52 PM India Time, _ravi_ wrote:
>>> 
>>>> And does it really matters about an article written by any
>>>> person who just wants to fill space in a daily and agree to the
>>>> senses? That was quiet absurd when the writer in the daily
>>>> claimed that Blue was a flop bcs of songs (or one song in
>>>> particular) as if every movie was an instant hit or flop with
>>>> its music. Had it been a case movies like Mann, Khamoshi should
>>>> have been listed among all time hits. I personally felt a
>>>> person who writes should do at least some amount of homework
>>>> and analysis when he writes in media than just writing opinions
>>>> and then generalizing it. And the one who doesn't is no less 
>>>> than an those ppl who preach evil and force ppl to believe in
>>>> their views. Coming back to Chiggy Wiggy I personally never
>>>> felt Kylie is one wonderful artist anytime
>>> I was worse off than you. I had never ever heard of Kylie before
>>> her getting roped in for Buloo.
>>> 
>>>> and I never borrowed the hypes surrounded;
>>> but I got curious about an international popular artist getting
>>> roped in first time for an Indian song, that too by my fav man. I
>>> was expectant and eager to hear it.
>>> 
>>>> So taking into account of ppl like me or to those who never
>>>> knew who Kylie is music sales volume is unaffected.
>>> I differ. I think several people must have got curious about this
>>> song that cost multi-million bucks and they would have bought it.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> It only matters who is the Composer and AR name is an influence
>>>> for sales.
>>> The song has harmed the reputation of ARR also, me think. It is
>>> less than mediocre by ARR's standards. It lacks creativity that
>>> was so visible in each of 800+ songs of ARR. If this is what our
>>> man is going to give after Oscars, and with an international
>>> popular, he was far better before Oscars and with Indian singers.
>>> If the movie flops at box office (I fear so) then ARR bashers are
>>> going to have a field day.
>>> 
>>> I am sure RAVANA is going to be a never-before highest point in
>>> ARR's life that will leave everybody spellbound.
>>> 
>>> -- Rawat
>>> 

 



Reply via email to